(The exact security of) Message Authentication Codes (Record no. 373536)
[ view plain ]
|fixed length control field||03629nam a22001697a 4500|
|003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER|
|005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION|
|008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION|
|fixed length control field||180627b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d|
|040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE|
|100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME|
|Personal name||Rybar, Michal|
|245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT|
|Title||(The exact security of) Message Authentication Codes|
|260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)|
|Name of publisher, distributor, etc.||IST Austria|
|Date of publication, distribution, etc.||2017|
|500 ## - GENERAL NOTE|
|505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE|
|Formatted contents note||Abstract
About the author
List of publications
List of abbreviations
3 Message Authentication Codes
4 Exact Security of HMAC
5 Exact Security of PMAC
6 Paper 1
7 paper 2
|520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.|
|Summary, etc.||In this thesis we discuss the exact security of message authentications codes HMAC,
NMAC, and PMAC. NMAC is a mode of operation which turns a fixed input-length keyed
hash function f into a variable input-length function. A practical single-key variant of
NMAC called HMAC is a very popular and widely deployed message authentication code
(MAC). PMAC is a block-cipher based mode of operation, which also happens to be the
most famous fully parallel MAC.
NMAC was introduced by Bellare, Canetti and Krawczyk Crypto’96, who proved it to
be a secure pseudorandom function (PRF), and thus also a MAC, under two assumptions.
Unfortunately, for many instantiations of HMAC one of them has been found to be wrong.
To restore the provable guarantees for NMAC, Bellare [Crypto’06] showed its security
without this assumption.
PMAC was introduced by Black and Rogaway at Eurocrypt 2002. If instantiated with
a pseudorandom permutation over n-bit strings, PMAC constitutes a provably secure
variable input-length PRF. For adversaries making q queries, each of length at most ` (in
n-bit blocks), and of total length σ ≤ q`, the original paper proves an upper bound on
the distinguishing advantage of O(σ 2 /2 n ), while the currently best bound is O(qσ/2 n ). In
this work we show that this bound is tight by giving an attack with advantage Ω(q 2 `/2 n ).
In the PMAC construction one initially XORs a mask to every message block, where the
mask for the ith block is computed as τ i := γ i · L, where L is a (secret) random value,
and γ i is the i-th codeword of the Gray code. Our attack applies more generally to any
sequence of γ i ’s which contains a large coset of a subgroup of GF (2 n ).
As for NMAC, our first contribution is a simpler and uniform proof: If f is an ε-secure
PRF (against q queries) and a δ-non-adaptively secure PRF (against q queries), then
NMAC f is an (ε + `qδ)-secure PRF against q queries of length at most ` blocks each. We
also show that this ε + `qδ bound is basically tight by constructing an f for which an
attack with advantage `qδ exists.
Moreover, we analyze the PRF-security of a modification of NMAC called NI by An and
Bellare that avoids the constant rekeying on multi-block messages in NMAC and allows
for an information-theoretic analysis. We carry out such an analysis, obtaining a tight
`q 2 /2 c bound for this step, improving over the trivial bound of ` 2 q 2 /2 c .
Finally, we investigate, if the security of PMAC can be further improved by using τ i ’s
that are k-wise independent, for k > 1 (the original has k = 1). We observe that the
security of PMAC will not increase in general if k = 2, and then prove that the security
increases to O(q 2 /2 n ), if the k = 4. Due to simple extension attacks, this is the best
bound one can hope for, using any distribution on the masks. Whether k = 3 is already
sufficient to get this level of security is left as an open problem.
|942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)|
|Source of classification or shelving scheme|
|Withdrawn status||Lost status||Source of classification or shelving scheme||Damaged status||Not for loan||Permanent Location||Current Location||Date acquired||Barcode||Date last seen||Price effective from||Koha item type|