International survey of research university faculty : use of bibliometric ratings, identifiers and indicators.

Contributor(s): Primary Research Group [publisher.]
Material type: TextTextPublisher: [New York] : Primary Research Group Inc., [2017]Copyright date: ©2017Description: 1 online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781574408867; 1574408860Other title: Use of bibliometric ratings, identifiers and indicatorsSubject(s): Bibliometrics | Research -- Evaluation -- Statistical methods | Decision making -- Methodology | Scholarly publishing -- Statistics | LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES -- Library & Information Science -- General | Bibliometrics | Decision making -- Methodology | Scholarly publishingGenre/Form: Electronic books. | Statistics. Additional physical formats: Print version:: No titleDDC classification: 020.72 LOC classification: Z669.8Online resources: Click here to access online Summary: This study presents data from 325 faculty of major universities in the USA, Canada, the UK, Ireland and Australia about how they view bibliometric indicators such as the h-index, how trustworthy they are believed to be and how often they are checked or calculated. The study presents data on the use of particular tools and indicators, giving specific data for all of the following: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, ORCID ID, Thomsen-Reuters Research ID, Scimago, bepress, SciVal, JSTORE, International, SciFinder, arXiv and CrossRef, among others. Data in the report is broken out by tenure status, gender, age, semester teaching load, academic field, academic title, and political views of the survey participant, as well as by the country or origin, public/private status and world ranking of the universities of the survey participants.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
eBook eBook e-Library

Electronic Book@IST

EBook Available
Total holds: 0

This study presents data from 325 faculty of major universities in the USA, Canada, the UK, Ireland and Australia about how they view bibliometric indicators such as the h-index, how trustworthy they are believed to be and how often they are checked or calculated. The study presents data on the use of particular tools and indicators, giving specific data for all of the following: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, ORCID ID, Thomsen-Reuters Research ID, Scimago, bepress, SciVal, JSTORE, International, SciFinder, arXiv and CrossRef, among others. Data in the report is broken out by tenure status, gender, age, semester teaching load, academic field, academic title, and political views of the survey participant, as well as by the country or origin, public/private status and world ranking of the universities of the survey participants.

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha